Effect of prophylactic balloon occlusion of internal iliac artery in pregnancies complicated by placenta previa and accreta.

BACKGROUND: Placenta previa and accreta are serious obstetric conditions that are associated with a high risk of intraoperative massive hemorrhage, the prophylactic intravascular balloon occlusion technique is increasingly used in managing uncontrolled hemorrhage in cesarean section (CS). We aim to examine the clinical effectiveness of prophylactic balloon occlusion of the internal iliac artery (PBOIIA) during CS in improving maternal outcomes for patients with placenta previa and accreta. METHODS: A total of 420 women with placenta previa and accreta who underwent CS from January 2014 to December 2018 were included retrospectively. Patients were divided into balloon group in which patients had PBOIIA (n = 248) and the control group in which patients did not have PBOIIA (n = 172). Meanwhile, we performed a subgroup analysis in whether taking parallel transverse uterine incision (PTUI) surgery. Information on conditions of patients and newborns, perioperative blood indicators, surgical outcomes were collected. RESULTS: Median estimated blood loss (mEBL) was 2200 mL in the balloon group and 2150 mL in the control group respectively, there was no significant difference between two-groups comparison (P > 0.05), and the rate of patients with hysterectomy was also has no difference between the two groups (36.3% verus 35.5%, P > 0.05), while there is a significant difference between two groups in the amount of PRBCs transfused [3 (0-31.5) verus 3 (0-39), P <0.05], moreover, the proportion of PRBCS> 8 units in the balloon group is significantly lower than that in control group (11.29% verus 23.26%, P <0.05).. However, the total hospitalization costs (45,624.4 ± 11,061.9 verus 37,523.1 ± 14,662.2, CYN) and surgery costs (19,910.6 ± 2622.6 verus 11,850.5 ± 3146.1, CYN) in balloon group were significantly higher than those in control group (P < 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed PTUI surgery had no significant differences in EBL (P >0.05), but it could significantly decrease hysterectomy rates (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PBOIIA has no significant effect on reducing intraoperative EBL and hysterectomy rate in patients with placenta previa and accreta. and although it could reduce the intraoperative PRBCs in patients with massive hemorrhage, it significantly increases the financial cost for patients. Therefore, PBOIIA should not be routinely recommended to patients with placenta previa and accreta.

Clinical analysis of second-trimester pregnancy termination after previous caesarean delivery in 51 patients with placenta previa and placenta accreta spectrum: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUNDS: Pregnancy termination during the second trimester in patients with placenta previa and placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is a complex and challenging clinical problem. Based on our literature review, there has been a relative increase in the number of such cases being treated by hysterotomy and/or local uterine lesion resection and repair. In the present study, a retrospective analysis was conducted to compare the clinical outcomes when different management strategies were used to terminate pregnancy in the patients with placenta previa and PAS. METHODS: A total of 51 patients who underwent pregnancy termination in the second trimester in Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital between June 2013 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed in this study. All patients having previous caesarean delivery (CD) were diagnosed with placenta previa status and PAS. RESULTS: ① Among the 51 patients, 16 cases received mifepristone and misoprostol medical termination, 15 cases received mifepristone and Rivanol medical termination, but 1 of them was transferred to hysterotomy due to failed labor induction, another 20 cases were performed planned hysterotomy. There was no placenta percreta cases and uterine artery embolization (UAE) was all performed before surgery.② There were 31 cases who underwent medical termination and 30 cases were vaginal delivery. Dilation and evacuation (D&E) were used in 20 cases of medical abortion failure and in all 30 cases of difficult manual removal of placental tissue. ③ A statistically significant difference was found among the three different strategies in terms of gestational weeks, the type of placenta previa status, main operative success rate and ß-HCG regression time (P < 0.05). ④ There were 4(7.8%) cases who were taken up for hysterectomy because of life-threatening bleeding or severe bacteremia during or after delivery and hysterotomy. The uterus was preserved with the implanted placenta partly or completely left in situ in 47(92.2%) cases. Combined medical and/or surgical management were used for the residual placenta and the time of menstrual recovery was 52(range: 33 to 86) days after pregnancy termination. CONCLUSIONS: Terminating a pregnancy by vaginal delivery through medical induction of labor may be feasible if clinicians have an overall understanding of gestational age, the type of placenta previa status, the type of placenta accreta, and patients concerns about preserving fertility. A collaborative team effort in tertiary medical centers with a very experience MDT and combined application of multiple methods is required to optimize patient outcomes.

Central placenta praevia accreta with focal bladder percretism. Conservative management.

Placenta praevia is a condition when placenta is inserted in an abnormal position near or over the internal cervical orifice (ICO). Abnormal placental attachment (placenta accreta, increta, percreta) is a wide spectrum disorder ranging from abnormal adherence to deeply invasive placental tissue. We report a very rare case of central placenta praevia accreta and focal bladder percretism in a 29 years old pregnant woman with an obstetrical history of one previous vaginal delivery and four curettages following miscarriage. She was taken in charge by Catania S. Marco' university-hospital at 20 weeks with diagnosis of Central Placenta Praevia and Accreta (CPPA) detected by means of ultrasounds (US). At 31 weeks Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) confirmed CPPA with focal bladder percretism. After alerting multidisciplinary team and obtaining blood units available, a Caesarean Section (CS) at 34 weeks was planned, when by means of US a detachment area with bleeding was observed. An adequate informed consent was completed, where the pregnant woman and her husband accepted the risk of possible hysterectomy and blood transfusions. A Pfannestiel's laparotomy with transversal corporal uterine incision, bilateral uterine ligation, packed tamponage, removal of placental tissue separated during fetal extraction and leaving a portion of placenta only in the place of percretism, allowed conservative intervention (uterus preservation) ending in good results for both mother and fetus. KEY WORDS: Caesarean section, Curettage, Placenta praevia, Placenta accreta, Preterm birth.

The routine use of prophylactic Bakri balloon tamponade contributes to blood loss control in major placenta previa.

OBJECTIVE: To verify the blood loss control effect of routine prophylactic Bakri balloon tamponade on major and minor placenta previa (PP). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all singleton pregnancies that involved cesarean section (CS) for PP at our hospital. All participants were divided into Bakri balloon (underwent routine prophylactic use just after placenta removal) and non-balloon groups, and into major and minor PP groups. Clinical outcomes in major and minor PP were compared between balloon and non-balloon groups. RESULTS: The balloon and non-balloon groups contained 74 and 89 patients, respectively. There were 41 and 33 (balloon group) and 48 and 41 (non-balloon group) major and minor PP cases, respectively. Intraoperative and perioperative blood losses of major PP were significantly lower in the balloon group than the non-balloon group (1045 ml versus 1553 ml, P = 0.016; and 1189 ml versus 1810 ml, P = 0.006, respectively). The frequency of massive postpartum hemorrhage (>500 ml) with major PP was lower in the balloon group than in the non-balloon group (2.4% versus 16.7%, P = 0.027), but with no significant difference with minor PP. CONCLUSION: Routine prophylactic use of Bakri balloon tamponade during and after CS is effective in controlling blood loss in major PP.

The application of prophylactic balloon occlusion of the internal iliac artery for the treatment of placenta accreta spectrum with placenta previa: a retrospective case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Severe obstetric haemorrhage caused by placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) results in significant maternal morbidity and mortality. The effectiveness of prophylactic balloon occlusion of the internal iliac artery in PAS patients remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective case-control study to investigate the clinical effectiveness of this treatment. METHODS: The clinical data of 104 patients with PAS complicated with placenta previa who delivered by caesarean section between January 2016 and January 2019 were collected, and the patients were divided into two groups. The study group (48 cases) underwent internal iliac artery preset balloon occlusion before caesarean section and uterine artery embolisation according to the bleeding status after surgery, while the control group (56 cases) did not undergo internal iliac artery preset balloon occlusion before caesarean section. RESULTS: The operation and hospitalisation times in the study group were longer than those in the control group. Additionally, the hysterectomy rate in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group. No significant differences in blood loss, blood transfusion volume, urinary system injury, postoperative ICU transfer rate, or neonatal scores were identified between the groups. Among the patients without invasive placenta (placenta increta and percreta), blood loss was lower in the study group, and the caesarean hysterectomy rate did not significantly differ between the groups. Among the patients with invasive placenta, blood loss and the caesarean hysterectomy rate did not significantly differ between the groups. The risk of hysterectomy in the study group was related to invasive placenta penetration, a large area of placental invasion, or abnormal vascular filling. One patient in the study group had a thrombus in the left lower extremity artery. CONCLUSIONS: Balloon occlusion of the internal iliac artery is effective for haemostasis of placenta previa in the absence of invasive placenta. For patients with invasive placenta, especially placenta percreta, a large area of placental invasion or abnormal vascular filling suggests the need for hysterectomy. The risks of the prophylactic use of internal iliac artery balloon occlusion include vascular injury and thrombus formation.

The role of cervical pessary and progesterone therapy in the phenomenon of placenta previa migration.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of combined management of placenta previa with the Arabin cervical pessary and progesterone.Study design: In this randomized controlled study, we followed up 217 patients with placenta previa and high risk of preterm birth. The main group (n = 81) underwent combined management with the Arabin cervical pessary and progesterone; the control group (n = 136) received progesterone only. Placental migration was monitored using Doppler scanning from 24 weeks of pregnancy onwards.Results: Patients receiving the combination of the Arabin cervical pessary and progesterone had a three-fold reduced rate of bleeding during pregnancy compared with patients in the control group (11.3% versus 33.1%; p = .006). Placental migration occurred 1.8 times more often in the pessary group (48.1% versus 26.4%; p = .037), and preterm labor <34 weeks occurred 2.7 times less often compared with the control group (p = .031). The use of the Arabin cervical pessary caused a change in the anterior cervico-uterine angle by 7.4 degrees, and reduction in the arcuate artery RI at 32-33 weeks of pregnancy compared with the control group.Conclusions: The use of the Arabin cervical pessary combined with progesterone in patients with placenta previa significantly reduced the rate of preterm delivery <34 weeks and bleeding during pregnancy.

Prophylactic abdominal aortic balloon occlusion in patients with pernicious placenta previa during cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials.

PURPOSE: Pernicious placenta previa induces severe hemorrhage during cesarean section. Abdominal aorta balloon occlusion (AABO) is considered as an effective operation for patients with pernicious placenta previa. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical application of abdominal aortic balloon occlusion in the placenta previa and cesarean section by systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WAN-FANG DATA and CQVIP were searched from inception to Jan. 15th, 2019. Operative time, intraoperative blood loss volume, postoperative hospitalization duration, intraoperative blood transfusion volume, hysterectomy rate, lower extremity thrombosis rate, ICU admission rate, adverse reaction rate, neonatal birth weight, Apgar 1-min and 5-min scores were regarded as the endpoints. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) were used for meta-analysis. RESULTS: Fourteen articles were retrieved from total 650 articles, and the results of meta-analysis showed that application of intraoperative AABO had the ability to reduce the operative time (WMD = - 16.581, 95% CI - 26.690 to - 6.472; P = 0.001), the intraoperative blood loss volume (WMD = - 1202.69, 95% CI - 1732.25 to - 673.12; P < 0.001), the intraoperative blood transfusion volume (WMD = - 1202.69, 95% CI - 1732.25 to - 673.12; P < 0.001). The hysterectomy rate (RR = 0.279, 95% CI 0.164-0.474; P < 0.001), postoperative hospitalization duration (WMD = - 1.423, 95% CI - 2.070 to - 0.776; P < 0.001) and the balloon preset time (WMD = - 13.793, 95% CI - 15.341 to - 12.244; P < 0.001; I2 = 0.0%) were also reduced in AABO group. CONCLUSIONS: Application of AABO in patients with pernicious placenta previa is safe and effective, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

Bleeding control using intrauterine continuous running suture during cesarean section in pregnant women with placenta previa.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of intrauterine continuous running suture during cesarean section in pregnant women with placenta previa. METHODS: We enrolled 277 women and medical records were retrospectively reviewed. Pregnant women were grouped according to uterine bleeding control methods as follows: Group A, using intrauterine continuous running suture and Group B (control group) using figure-of-eight suture. RESULTS: Intrauterine continuous running sutures were used in 104 pregnant women. Mean total blood loss in Group A was significantly less than that in Group B (1332.70 ± 152.92 mL vs 1861.56 ± 157.74 mL, P = 0.029). Mean total transfusion unit of Group A was significantly less than that in Group B (1.74 ± 0.41 vs 3.52 ± 0.75, P = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Intrauterine continuous running sutures can significantly reduce postpartum blood loss and transfusion units during cesarean section in pregnant women with placenta previa.

Pre-cesarean prophylactic balloon placement in the internal iliac artery to prevent postpartum hemorrhage among women with pernicious placenta previa.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate pre-cesarean prophylactic balloon placement (PBP) in the internal iliac artery among women with pernicious placenta previa. METHODS: The present retrospective study included women with pernicious placenta previa who underwent cesarean delivery at Shanghai Renji Hospital, Shanghai, China, between March 1, 2011, and June 30, 2017. Data were compared between patients who did and did not undergo PBP. RESULTS: Among 42 patients included, 20 underwent PBP and 22 did not. Mean ± SD estimated blood loss was 2900.00 ± 2352.21 mL in the PBP group, and 4549.77 ± 2366.67 mL in the non-PBP group (P=0.025). The amount of transfused red blood cells was 8.40 ± 7.14 U and 13.00 ± 7.93 U (P=0.018), respectively. No patients in the PBP group developed postoperative disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, compared with 3 (14%) in the non-PBP group (P=0.087). In the PBP and non-PBP groups, the hospital stay duration was 7.40 ± 3.07 and 8.68 ± 2.58 days (P=0.029), and there were 1 and 7 patients who had obstetric hysterectomies (P=0.027), respectively. Two patients experienced PBP-related adverse events, including thrombosis and re-bleeding. There were no deaths. CONCLUSION: Pre-cesarean PBP in the internal iliac artery was a safe and effective treatment that could reduce the incidence of both postpartum hemorrhage and hysterectomy among women with pernicious placenta previa.

Endovascular interventional modalities for haemorrhage control in abnormal placental implantation deliveries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of endovascular interventional modalities for haemorrhage control in abnormal placentation deliveries. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched from inception to July 2017. Blood loss volume was regarded as the primary endpoint. Other important results are described. Random and fixed effects models were used for the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Of 385 studies identified, 69 (1,811 patients, mean age 32.9 years, range 23-39 years) were included. Mean gestational age at delivery was 35.1 weeks (range 27-38 weeks). Of 1,395 patients who underwent endovascular intervention, 587 (42%) had placenta accreta, 254 (18%) placenta increta and 313 (22%) placenta percreta. Prophylactic balloon occlusion of the internal iliac arteries (PBOIIA) was performed in 470 patients (33.6%), of the abdominal aorta (PBOAA) in 460 patients (33%), of the uterine artery (PBOUA) in 181 patients (13%), and of the common iliac arteries (PBOCIA) in 21 patients (1.5%). Primary embolization of the UA was performed in 246 patients (18%), of the pelvic collateral arteries in 12 patients (0.9%), and of the anterior division of the IIA in 5 patients (0.3%). Follow-up ranged from 0.5 to 42 months. Endovascular intervention was associated with less blood loss than no endovascular intervention (p < 0.001) with the lowest blood loss volume in patients who underwent PBOAA (p < 0.001). PBOAA was associated with a lower rate of hysterectomy (p = 0.030). Endovascular intervention did not result in increases in operative time or hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular intervention is effective in controlling haemorrhage in abnormal placentation deliveries. PBOAA was associated with a lower rate of hysterectomy and less blood loss than other modalities. KEY POINTS: • Endovascular intervention in abnormal placentation deliveries is effective in reducing blood loss. • Endovascular intervention did not result in longer operative time or hospital stay. • Prophylactic balloon occlusion of the abdominal aorta is superior to other modalities.

A prospective observational study evaluating the efficacy of prophylactic internal iliac artery balloon catheterization in the management of placenta previa-accreta: A STROBE compliant article.

We studied the efficacy of prophylactic internal iliac artery balloon catheterization for managing severe hemorrhage caused by pernicious placenta previa.This prospective observational study was conducted in Tongji Hospital, Wuhan, China. One hundred sixty-three women past 32-week's gestation with placenta previa-accreta were recruited and managed. Women in the balloon group accepted prophylactic internal iliac artery balloon catheterization before scheduled caesarean delivery and controls had a conventional caesarean delivery. Intraoperative hemorrhage, transfusion volume, radiation dose, exposure time, complications, and neonatal outcomes were discussed.Significant differences were detected in estimated blood loss (1236.0 mL vs 1694.0 mL, P = .01), calculated blood loss (CBL) (813.8 mL vs 1395.0 mL, P < .001), CBL of placenta located anteriorly (650.5 mL vs 1196.0 mL, P = .03), and anterioposteriorly (928.3 mL vs 1680.0 mL, P = .02). Prophylactic balloon catheterization could reduce intraoperative red blood cell transfusion (728.0 mL vs 1205.0 mL, P = .01) and lessen usage of perioperative hemostatic methods. The incidence of hysterectomy was lower in balloon group. Mean radiation dose was 29.2 mGy and mean exposure time was 92.2 seconds. Neonatal outcomes and follow-up data did not have significant difference.Prophylactic internal iliac artery balloon catheterization is an effective method for managing severe hemorrhage caused by placenta previa-accreta as it reduced intraoperative blood loss, lessened perioperative hemostatic measures and intraoperative red cell transfusions, and reduce hysterectomies.

Maternal outcome after conservative management of abnormally invasive placenta.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe our preliminary experience of the efficacy and safety of a conservative strategy for abnormally invasive placenta. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of eight pregnant women with abnormally invasive placenta (one with placenta previa accrete, three with placenta previa increta, and four with previa percreta) was performed. The diagnosis was made by prenatal ultrasonography, and was confirmed by operative and histopathological findings. Patients who desired future fertility or who had extensive diseases were selected as candidates after panel meeting. Conservative management after obtaining informed consent was defined by a primary cesarean delivery before 35 weeks of gestation with the abnormally adherent placenta left in situ, partially or totally. The primary outcome was successful uterine preservation. The secondary outcome was severe maternal morbidity including sepsis, coagulopathy, immediate or delayed hemorrhage bladder injury, and fistula. RESULTS: Among the eight patients, the mean age was 34 ± 3 years (range, 30-40 years). All women had risk factors, such as placental previa, previous cesarean delivery and/or dilation & curettage, for abnormally invasive placenta. Seven women underwent planned cesarean delivery at the mean gestation age of 34 weeks (range, 31-37 weeks). One woman received hysterotomy at 18 weeks. In our series, the uterus was preserved in only two cases (25%), one who received hysterotomy at a relatively young gestational age and another who had mild disease. Mean maternal blood loss during primary cesarean delivery was 528 ± 499 ml (range, 100 ml-1,500 ml). Severe maternal morbidity was recorded in seven out of eight patients (87.5%). CONCLUSION: In this small series, we observed a low successful uterine preservation rate and a high maternal complication rate. We recommend that primary cesarean hysterectomy should be used as the treatment of choice for mild to severe abnormally invasive placenta. Conservative management should be reserved for women with a strong fertility desire and women with extensive disease that precludes primary hysterectomy due to surgical difficulty.

Risk of hemorrhage in abnormally invasive placenta according to its management.

Severe hemorrhage is a major concern during operative procedures for abnormally invasive placenta (AIP). We reviewed published literature with the objective to provide evidence of blood loss with the most common treatment options for AIP. We selected 54 articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Cesarean hysterectomy, with or without occlusion balloons in the internal iliac arteries, was the treatment associated with the greatest blood loss. Major blood loss was also associated with the placenta left in situ (reported in 3 of 10 articles), and with uterine artery embolization (reported in 3 of 15 articles). The best outcomes were seen for cesarean hysterectomy with balloon occlusion of the common iliac arteries (CIA; 9 patients, including 1 with major blood loss), balloon occlusion of the abdominal aorta (27 patients, no major blood loss) and conservative surgery (99 patients, including one with major blood loss). In conclusion, cesarean hysterectomy with balloon occlusion of the CIA or abdominal aorta, and conservative treatments seem to have the best outcomes. However, our results are based on a small number of articles. Hence, it is necessary to have available more reports on the outcomes of these treatments, to arrive at a more definitive conclusion.

Clinical evaluation of balloon occlusion of the lower abdominal aorta in patients with placenta previa and previous cesarean section: A retrospective study on 43 cases.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the efficacy of balloon occlusion of the lower abdominal aorta in cesarean section surgery for the patients with placenta previa and previous cesarean section. METHODS: The patients who had placenta previa and underwent cesarean section (CS) were evaluated. The patients treated with CS to terminate the pregnancy were used as control group (23 cases); the patients treated with the preset abdominal aorta balloon before CS was taken as study group (20 cases). The investigated indicators included the intraoperative blood loss, blood loss within postoperative 24 h, the transfusion amount of red cell suspension (RCS), hospital stay, incidence rate of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), the asphyxia, premature delivery and the mortality of the newborns. RESULTS: The two groups are comparable. The intraoperative blood loss, blood loss within postoperative 24 h, the transfusion amount of RCS and the percentage of uterus resection in the study group were significantly lower (P < 0.05) than that in the control group. The percentage of uterine cavity filling with ribbon gauze in the study group was higher than the control group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The balloon occlusion of lower abdominal aorta seems effective in reducing postpartum hemorrhage and the blood transfusion and decreasing the risk of hysterectomy without harming the newborns.

Blood-Conservation Strategies in a Blood-Refusal Parturient with Placenta Previa and Placenta Percreta.

Abnormal placentation can be associated with significant blood loss and massive blood transfusions. Caring for parturients with abnormal placentation who refuse blood transfusion is very challenging. We present a 35-year-old, gravida 3, para 1, Jehovah's Witness at 35 weeks of gestation with placenta percreta, who underwent cesarean delivery and delayed hysterectomy. A multidisciplinary team developed a plan, including the use of perioperative erythropoietin and IV iron dextran, intraoperative acute normovolemic hemodilution, cell salvage, tranexamic acid, and uterine artery embolization. This strategy was successful in avoiding the need for allogeneic transfusion and ensuring an uneventful recovery after both surgical procedures.

Counseling in fetal medicine: evidence-based answers to clinical questions on morbidly adherent placenta.

Although the incidence of morbidly adherent placenta (MAP) has risen progressively in the last two decades, there remains uncertainty about the diagnosis and management of this condition. The aim of this review is to provide up-to-date and evidence-based answers to common clinical questions regarding the diagnosis and management of MAP. Different risk factors have been associated with MAP; however, previous Cesarean section and placenta previa are the most frequently associated. Ultrasound is the primary method for diagnosing MAP and has a good overall diagnostic accuracy for its detection. When considering the different ultrasound signs of MAP, color Doppler seems to provide the best diagnostic performance. Magnetic resonance imaging has the same accuracy in diagnosing MAP as does ultrasound examination; its use should be considered when a resective procedure, such as hysterectomy, is planned as it can provide detailed information about the topography of placental invasion and predict difficulties that may arise in surgery. The optimal gestational age for delivery in pregnancies with MAP is yet to be established; planning surgery between 34 and 36 weeks of gestation provides the best balance between fetal maturity and the risk of unexpected episodes of heavy bleeding, which are more likely to occur with delivery after this timepoint, especially in severe cases of MAP. The optimal surgical approach to MAP depends on multiple factors, including availability of an experienced team, specific surgical skills and hospital resources. Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

[Management of placenta previa and accreta]. / Prise en charge des placenta praevia et accreta.

OBJECTIVE: Produce recommendations for the management of placenta previa and placenta accrete. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using Medline and the Cochrane Library over a period from 1950 to 31/12/2013. Recommendations of the latest scientific societies have also been consulted. RESULTS: In cases of placenta previa, if bleeding episode before 34weeks gestation occurs, a short hospitalization and tocolysis may help stop bleeding (grade C). Vaginal delivery is preferable when the distance between the internal cervical os and the placental edge is greater than 20mm. When this distance is less than 20mm, vaginal delivery is possible (professional consensus). Caesarean section is recommended in cases of placenta overlapping the internal os (professional consensus). Antenatal screening placenta accreta could improve care (EL3). Upon discovery of a placenta accreta during childbirth, it is better to avoid a forced removal of the placenta (grade C). Conservative treatment or cesarean hysterectomy are possible (grade C). The management of placental abnormalities should be planned and managed with a multidisciplinary team (professional consensus). The use of blood-saving techniques such as "cell saver" is possible in situations where early intraoperative bleeding would be>1500mL (grade C). There are no studies that have sufficient methodological value to recommend an anesthetic technique [general anaesthesia (GA) or neuraxial anaesthesia] over another in the context of placental abnormalities (grade B). When a major bleeding risk is identified, GA can be chosen in order to avoid emergency conversions in difficult conditions (professional consensus). CONCLUSION: Placental insertion abnormalities require anesthetic and obstetric coordination. Delivery must be planned in a suitable structure.

Obstetric complications of placenta previa percreta.

INTRODUCTION: Placenta previa is related to severe maternal and fetal morbidity. The increasing incidence of cesarean delivery rate causes a marked increase in abnormally invasive placenta over the past decades. The abnormally invasive placenta is becoming the foremost cause of obstetric hemorrhage and postpartum hysterectomy, causing a significant maternal and fetal morbidity and even mortality. Maternal morbidity in such cases also comprise politransfusion, development of disseminated intravascular coagulation, uterine rupture, cystostomy, fistula formation, ureteral stricture, intensive care unit admission, infection, and prolonged hos- pitalization, adult respiratory distress syndrome, renal failure, septicemia and even death. CASE REPORT: A 38-year-old gravida 3, para 2, was admitted to our hospital at 27 weeks of gestation as an emergency due to vaginal bleeding, previously diagnosed with an anterior placenta previa. Following tocolytic therapy, bleeding stopped. The patient was informed on the diagnosis and the possibility of life-threatening hemorrhage necessitating preterm delivery. She was given corticosteroids to enhance fetal lung maturity. At 28 weeks of gestation, she experienced massive vaginal bleeding, and a decision was made to perform emergency cesarean section. We made a corporeal transverse uterine incision well above the uterovesical fold and tortuous vessels, at the same time avoiding the superior edge of the placenta. The placenta was found to be densely adherent to the lower uterine segment, penetrating through it and infiltrating the posterior wall of the urinary bladder. An attempt to remove the placenta resulted in injury to the bladder wall and the uterine rupture at a previous cesarean scar. The decision was made to perform total abdominal hysterectomy with placenta left in situ. At present, both mother and the baby are well. CONCLUSION: Anticipation and the surgeon's judgment are leading factors for surgery, from the choice of uterine incision type to the decision to proceeding to hysterectomy in order to reduce maternal morbidity.

Percretismo placentario: manejo con oclusión de arterias ilíacas internas, embolización de arterias uterinas y oclusión de arterias ilíacas comunes / Placenta previa percreta: handling with occlusion of internal iliac artery, uterine artery embolization and occlusion of common iliac arteries

Presentamos el caso de una embarazada con placenta ístmica, percreta, previa central, con extensas anastomosis vasculares y flujo de alta velocidad. En la resolución mediante cesárea-histerectomía, para prevenir la hemorragia intraoperatoria, se utilizó una intervención radiológica en secuencia de oclusión temporal de las ilíacas internas, embolización de las arterias uterinas, reposicionamiento e insuflación de balones en ilíacas comunes. Se logró mantener estabilidad hemodinámica y el control del sangrado; estando ocluida la circulación uterina hubo pérdidas moderadas en la parte final de la operación. Se discuten la característica poco común de la implantación y percretismo ístmico, y el beneficio del uso combinado de la oclusión vascular con la cirugía expedita para minimizar el riesgo materno.

We present a patient with placenta previa percreta and oclusive. It had extensive vascular anastomosis with high velocity flow, in which resolution by cesarean-hysterectomy was done for bleeding control and followed by temporal occlusion of iliac arteries, embolization of uterine arteries, reposition and insuflation of balloons in common iliac arteries. The patient was stable and moderated bleeding happened to the end of intervention when the uterine arterial circulation was occluded. We discuss the uncommon of isthmic implantation and percretism and the benefits of both vascular occlusion and expedite surgery for to minimize maternal compromise or damage.